Replies

"that is the standard that scientist require of science."

Like the standards used by Arnd Leike of the University of Munich, in demonstrating that beer froth obeys the mathematical Law of Exponential Decay?

[REFERENCE: "Demonstration of the Exponential Decay Law Using Beer Froth," Arnd Leike, European Journal of Physics, vol. 23, January 2002, pp. 21-26.]

Frankly, none of us can say how life started, because we weren't there.

But I want Intelligent Design as a field of inquiry to continue. This is only fair and just. If the theory produces nothing permanent, so be it.

Science is supposed to change; theories are corrected, extended, or sometimes even tossed out entirely as new information appears. To not do so would violate the scientific method.

Chances are that the evolution theory is doomed to be replaced by something else eventually anyway and not recognizing that is illogical.

Good night, all.

Excellent Point ! Plus it seems everyone forgets Science is started with theories of men. These theories must be proved in order to get the answer man wishes to obtain. When did man become infallible? How dare people tell us Science is perfect when it is man who devised it and comes up with the ideas and all of these alleged discoveries.
Artifacts have been found for centuries on man but yet Darwin ends on an island and everything he says is factual? Then they want to whine about teaching Intelligent Design? An idea that this universe, this world, along with humans were designed by an Intelligent being? These g-d haters have become so entrenched in their need to not acknowledge they may be wrong, they try to stop others from making a fair and accurate comparison for others to make a choice. If evolution is so absolute then why fear comparing it with Intelligent Design?