Oh I forgot. This is the way scientists talk.
That's because that's what your argument deserved.
You got off easy. You should see how scientists talk about other 'real' scientists when a 'real' challenge is made to a 'real' idea that has broad consensual acceptance. It's similar, but much more sophisticated. Whenever you risk your life on the accuracy and consensual acceptance of scientific theories, and you do it many times every day, think about that.
Crap (like ID) is often dismissed with the kind of rhetoric it deserves.
That's how 'real' science works.
No, Sir. That is not the way scientists talk. That is the way left-wing ideologue professors talk when reason fails them.