Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
I am sure with a tiny bit of effort you can find someone around here to go through a bunch of rhetorical acrobatics trying to explain the "Problem of Evil" some other way.

AntiGuv, with all due respect, I am not interested in the "problem of evil." I am interested in intelligent design as a scientific theory to be taught in schools.

I would love to discuss the thoughts in your first paragraph, but not in the context of good and evil.

79 posted on 11/11/2005 5:32:00 PM PST by Wolfstar (Whatever happened to "These Colors Don't Run?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfstar

So far as I can tell though, I have answered your basic question: the existence of birth defects can be explained within the rubric of ID by postulating either an incompetent or a malevolent design, preferably both.

ID is not science. You can just make it up as you go along. So, when little Billy asks his teacher: "Since life is intelligently designed, why are there Siamese twins?" then she can answer: "Because the designer is a wicked moron, dear."

Bam! It's reconciled..


94 posted on 11/11/2005 5:49:25 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson