That, of course, is one of the most profound questions human beings have about our world. How did life begin? If intelligent design were being put forward as an answer to that question, I might embrace it much more easily. However, ID is not being put forward to answer that question, but rather as an alternative theory to evolution.
Because I'm not a member of a Protestant demonination, I don't take every word in the Bible literally, but figuratively. Evolution is not incompatible with my religious beliefs.
Putting religion aside and looking solely at the scientific point of view, even in historical times over the last 5000-6000 years, humanity has evolved from primitive to modern civilization. Now a relatively new theory called intelligent design has been developed to challenge evolution. I would like to understand it. Only then could I determine whether or not I agree with the ID theory.
Darwin believed in intelligent design. He thought his theory was a component of it.
What is absolutely bizarre is the secularists who think they have cleverly hijacked the theory into some sort of secular sanctuary.
I think a number or reasonable explanations have been offered in this thread but you seem to be waiting for the 'hidden' religion agenda. Once you deem it religious, you indicate vindication. Science and religion are not distinct.