Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sloth
Your flaw is in assuming that the designer desires every specimen to be perfect.

No, my flaw, such as there might be, is in not making it clear that I was interested in the scientific basis for ID, not the religious basis.

201 posted on 11/11/2005 8:08:19 PM PST by Wolfstar (Whatever happened to "These Colors Don't Run?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfstar
No, my flaw, such as there might be, is in not making it clear that I was interested in the scientific basis for ID, not the religious basis.

OK, but that's not what you asked. You spoke of how "cruel" birth defects are, and wanted to know how they could be reconciled to ID. Since ID makes no claims that organisms are perfect, nor any claims about the benevolence or malice of the designer, there is nothing to "reconcile."

219 posted on 11/11/2005 8:40:13 PM PST by Sloth ("I don't think I've done a good job for 25 years" -- Mary Mapes. "I agree." -- Sloth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson