[Nathan Zachary]

Big hairy deal. it doesn't change the FACTS at all.

"Boo hoo! Your posting from textbooks pdf files and clips from other web sites! WAHHHH!"

That is what you are saying. You can't counter the evidence, so you attack the person who presents it to get off the subject.

That's weak.

[js1138]

"Boo hoo! Your posting from textbooks pdf files and clips from other web sites! WAHHHH!"

Plagiarism is not nice. If you had done this in high school you would have flunked the course; in college you would have been expelled.

If you had written this stuff yourself, the teachers would still be laughing.

The thing you should be most ashamed of is that there are ID advocates who at least ask interesting questions and find actual unanswered questions, and you are not in their league.

[js1138]

That is what you are saying. You can't counter the evidence, so you attack the person who presents it to get off the subject.

Your side will have its day in court (literally). It will be amusing to see what they have to say when under oath.