[Nathan Zachary]

" You cannot apply science to a supernatural assumption

You can't study DNA? I didn't know that....

How do YOU suppose it got there? Did it magicly apear on it's own? You can't study supernatural assumtion. See how that works? TBBT is supernatral assumption at a much grandeir scale that belief in God and ID.

[Dimensio]

You can't study DNA?

Non-sequitur.

How do YOU suppose it got there?

I make no claims of knowledge in that field. My expertise is in computer science. Regardless, this is a discussion of the theory of evolution, which also makes no claims as to the origin of DNA.

Did it magicly apear on it's own?

It could have. But if it did, science could never arrive at that conclusion.

You can't study supernatural assumtion.

No, you can't apply the scientific method to supernatural assumptions. You can study it, but what you use to study it isn't science.

See how that works?

Yes. You, however, don't. It's hard to tell from your ranting, but it seems as though you are asserting that DNA, because we don't have a definitive natural explanation for its origin, is supernatural in nature. That's not accurate. You are, in this respect, wrong.

TBBT is supernatral assumption at a much grandeir scale that belief in God and ID.

1) We're discussing the theory of evolution, not Big Bang theory.

2) No, it is not supernatural, despite your sophmoric attempts to redefine the terminology.

3) To which "God", out of the thousands of deities worshipped and acknowledged throughout human history, do you refer and why?