[Nathan Zachary]

There is no transitional fossil record.This is what is needed to give any evidence for Darwins theory of evolution ( descent with modification). There is no transitional fossil record.

But by all means, if you claim there is one show us all. I'm sure every museum in the world would be interested in acquiring it for even ONE species.

Darwin also said everything sprouted forth from spontanious generation. Everything, plant and animal, has one common ancestor, a supposed single cell that created itself. He said " original life probably arose from a "little pond" where sunlight was acting on organic salts". Modern evolutionists, proclaim that "ultraviolet light acting on a primitive atmosphere of water, ammonia & methane produced a "hot dilute soup" of basic life".

If you find that funny, so do I. It's magic! The people claim ID relies on magic, I claim so does TOE. At least ID is more believable. Modern biology proves ID. Nobody put me up to anything. My posts reflect both what evolutionists say and creationists say. Perhaps TOE people should read up on what TOE is, before they claim "it doesn't say that". TOE is Cosmic Evolution, Stellar Evolution, Chemical Evolution, Planetary Evolution, Organic Evolution, Macro Evolution and finally Micro Evolution. each step in the TOE requires magic. If you find it humorous, good. So do I. TOE people make such fools of themselves.

[shuckmaster]

There is no transitional fossil record.

False

I'm sure every museum in the world would be interested in acquiring it

Every natural science museum already has plenty off them. Quit making such a fool of yourself and stop by to check them out sometimes.

[jennyp]

There is no transitional fossil record.This is what is needed to give any evidence for Darwins theory of evolution ( descent with modification). There is no transitional fossil record.

But by all means, if you claim there is one show us all. I'm sure every museum in the world would be interested in acquiring it for even ONE species.

For the lurkers who are genuinely wondering about this:

• This eight-year old list has over 200 transitional fossils.
   
• If they found a true transitional between chimps & humans, how would we laypeople know? Perhaps if creationists themselves couldn't agree on whether the fossil was "just an old ape" vs. "just an old human"!

[RightWingNilla]

There is no transitional fossil record.

Try visiting a natural history museum sometime.

[VadeRetro]

What have I linked you twice already? Hello?

If we're going to argue from our own inability to see what is right there, I have a beter idea. There is no Nathan Zachary.