Skip to comments.
Returning to Dover [evolution trial in Dover, PA: week 2]
York Daily Record [Penna] ^
| 03 October 2005
| TERESA MCMINN
Posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580, 581-582 next last
To: VadeRetro
561
posted on
10/04/2005 6:52:14 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: VadeRetro
I see the pattern. Funny thing, though, they say no two snowflakes are alike. Might be so, and likewise no two quartz crystals are alike. The specific shape and composition of the crystal indicates each crystal forms to a different pattern. The pattern disappears unless the reference is to an ideal pattern. A pattern in the mind.
Anyway, back to evolution, the science of taxonomy.
562
posted on
10/04/2005 7:02:24 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
You know, you're right, that last one isn't absolutely identical to this one.
![](http://www.mineralminers.com/html/lemm135b.jpg)
For all that, there's a consistency in nature. A pattern. It's out there to be seen.
I don't like semantics and I don't like "It's all in the mind" unless something really IS all in the mind. Some things are all in the mind, but not everything.
Taxonomy is somewhat arbitrary, yes. It tends to fail as you go back in the fossil record to the divergence point between branches. The taxons tend to be based on specimens from farther up the branches where the distinction is clearer.
That wouldn't happen so much if evolution were false. That it does happen quite reliably points to evolution having happened.
563
posted on
10/04/2005 7:09:09 PM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: VadeRetro
What? You don't have a head lamp?
564
posted on
10/04/2005 7:10:16 PM PDT
by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Another version--can we hope this one is real?--of the Byrn Mawr thing:
If all the young ladies who attended the Yale prom were laid end to end, no one would be the least surprised.
565
posted on
10/04/2005 7:12:40 PM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
the world has patterns and processes whether there is an intelligence to understand them Change whether to where. Two letters and we are in substantial agreement. 2500 years ago the sun went around the earth, but it wasn't the sun as we know it. It was a chariot or a phoenix bird. Then came a change in pattern. 500 years ago the sun went around the earth. Then came a change in pattern and the earth goes around the sun. 500 more years could bring another pattern and they will wonder how we could possibly not see reality as it really is. You are right the world has patterns and processes, but in addition we create this world in our minds, and no two minds agree completely. Nor should they says Emerson.
For a bad idea, Paley's metaphor sure has stuck around.
566
posted on
10/04/2005 7:13:13 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
" Change whether to where. "
No. The world has patterns and processes whether there is an intelligence to recognize it or not. There could be no intelligent being and the universe would still be what it is.
"2500 years ago the sun went around the earth, but it wasn't the sun as we know it. "
No, it didn't. People were wrong. The world existed as it is whether we knew it or not.
"You are right the world has patterns and processes, but in addition we create this world in our minds, and no two minds agree completely. Nor should they says Emerson."
The universe cares not what we think. It is.
" For a bad idea, Paley's metaphor sure has stuck around."
That is not evidence it is right. Lot's of false ideas persist.
567
posted on
10/04/2005 7:21:15 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: VadeRetro
Oh, evolution is as real as anything. It's not understood properly, nor is it used properly. I don't like semantics much either, too many amateurs and dilettantes in the arena, but semiology is another matter. Evolution was created by a committee, a constantly evolving committee, and evolution itself is evolving. Semantics is a problem when it comes to the meaning of words; for example, Liberals equate Progress to Evolution as if evolution means improvement always. But, progress can be around and around a circular track.
As the Red Queen said, words mean what I intend them to mean. Progress means to step forward, that is, in the direction you happen to be facing. Evolution means to turn out--like kneading bread dough.
568
posted on
10/04/2005 7:25:10 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
We need to understand and deal with that which is real. Indeed, too many people are trying to obfuscate, but I'm not at all sure you and I are talking about the same people.
Out for the night.
569
posted on
10/04/2005 7:28:11 PM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
There could be no intelligent being and the universe would still be what it is. The old place just wouldn't be the same without us.
570
posted on
10/04/2005 7:28:34 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
" The old place just wouldn't be the same without us."
Sure it would. It wouldn't know we left.
571
posted on
10/04/2005 7:31:44 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
It wouldn't know we left. That's right. That's our job.
572
posted on
10/04/2005 7:36:08 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
" That's right. That's our job."
The point is, the regularity of the universe exists regardless of what intelligence is aware of it or not.
573
posted on
10/04/2005 7:39:43 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Astrology has been around longer than Paley.
574
posted on
10/04/2005 7:58:37 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: RightWingNilla
Isn't his first name Calvin?
575
posted on
10/04/2005 8:14:41 PM PDT
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: All; PatrickHenry
You guys are getting desperate.
PH we need a new thread.
576
posted on
10/04/2005 8:20:51 PM PDT
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: RightWhale
Who's the first witness scheduled for tomorrow?
To: connectthedots
Vienna Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn?
578
posted on
10/05/2005 1:52:39 AM PDT
by
MHalblaub
(Tell me in four more years (No, I did not vote for Kerry))
To: b_sharp
Given your ideas on "bullet," I hate to ask for whom you were suggesting "diapers."
579
posted on
10/05/2005 7:23:54 AM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: connectthedots
The two million year old man. Finally we will get some answers. Unfortunately, he remembers only his childhood, but, fortunately, as if it happened yesterday.
580
posted on
10/05/2005 8:15:36 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580, 581-582 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson