Posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
But in the case of cars, we know they don't sneak off to do the nasty after being put in the garage at night, so we know they don't genetically inherit design features from previous generations of automobiles. If they did, and we also saw no observable evidence of the intervention of automotive designers implementing design changes, it would be reasonable to conclude that the similarities between the cars indicated a common ancestor automobile.
who the heck is Randal Niles?
If you don't know, you'd better do some research! He's the guy who's been plagiarizing your writings and posting them on the Internet cleverly pre-dated to make it appear as if he wrote them first.
It might your reasonable conclusion, but that does not make it a fact.
It might your reasonable conclusion, but that does not make it a fact.
I've slowly and cautiously tried to be respectful to many evo's I've come across here. That hard and patient work by both sides should not topple so fast just because a couple comments are made. NO MATTER WHO SAYS THEM.
I was not here in the past through all the previous garbage, I was not a part of the group that got banned, I am a regular joe schmo lunch pail slob that simply likes to read interesting articles about the origins of life.
I dont mind reading about how other people believe differently. Many times I find it quite interesting that people can hold particular views.
Dont even say to me, well this group of people behaves like this
so we can too. It sounds like youre 8 years old.
A good walk away from the keyboard can cure a lot of the arguments on here. People need to quit reading threads with the point of making sure their pride isnt going to get hurt.
I aint perfect but life has a way of making you realize what does and does not matter. Having someone post a rude comment to you does not mean you have to go ape-crap full of revenge. Dont take the flame bait.
Recently (over the past couple weeks) Ive had a couple posts with evos that have nothing to do with evo. Do you realize how refreshing that is to realize you probably still have something in common with people of different viewpoints. Do you realize how human you will become to each other instead of an empty screen.
I can appreciate sarcasm and humor but mocking, name-calling and rudeness need not be the typical response we try to needle each other with. Again, NO MATTER WHO SAYS THEM.
Alright rant over, I needed to get that out.
till later
Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info
Its not just the functional parts (only about 3%) that are shared. All of the genetic garbage and broken stuff is as well.
How do you explain that? A designer who would (a.) Make all of these mistakes in the first place (95% of the time) AND (b.) Put them in organisms in such a pattern as to explicitly spell out common descent is either stupid, malicous, deceitful or all three.
There is no transitional fossil record.This is what is needed to give any evidence for Darwins theory of evolution ( descent with modification). There is no transitional fossil record.For the lurkers who are genuinely wondering about this:But by all means, if you claim there is one show us all. I'm sure every museum in the world would be interested in acquiring it for even ONE species.
...as Seinfeld would add, "Not that there's anything wrong with that."
Try visiting a natural history museum sometime.
The OJ jury would agree with you.
Why did you ping me with your complaints? I've posted only once in this thread since the first three posts. And I don't recall that I've ever posted to you in my life.
As far as science is concerned on this planet, The complex DNA language fits the definition of machine, which requires intelligence to build. The cell can't create itself without it, so that leaves the question how did the DNA molecule create itself?
What would be the purpose of it creating itself when the cell did not yet exist? All things would have to be present at the same time for that one single purpose. It is simply far to complex to have created itself spontaneously. the odds are beyond calculation, and is billions of times past the scientific definition of impossible. (one in 10/40) Just who believes in magic?
Quit beating around the bush and state your point. :)
In general it's best to hit the back button before posting stuff like that. You want Mommy Moderator to wipe your bottom for you?
2 fold:
You posted the article on the thread so I used it to bounce my comments off of.
You maintain the evo list and I thought you should know.
Yes you did. Right here.
Oh yeah. I remember now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.