Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: andyk

I'm saying Judge White did a little constructive re-interpretation of the 16th amendment and got creative.


71 posted on 09/02/2005 2:44:09 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Sonny M
I'm saying Judge White did a little constructive re-interpretation of the 16th amendment and got creative.

It was only three years after the amendment was ratified, so I certainly wouldn't consider it a re-interpretation. Brushaber held that Congress had the power to tax incomes prior to the 16th amendment.

the whole purpose of the Amendment was to relieve all income taxes when imposed from apportionment from a consideration of the source whence the income was derived.
84 posted on 09/02/2005 3:37:33 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson