Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sonny M
in the Supreme Court case Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., (1916), Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

"But, aside from the obvious error of the proposition, intrinsically considered, it manifestly disregards the fact that by the previous ruling it was settled that the provisions of the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation, but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged, and being placed [240 U.S. 103, 113] in the category of direct taxation subject to apportionment by a consideration of the sources from which the income was derived,-that is, by testing the tax not by what it was, a tax on income, but by a mistaken theory deduced from the origin or source of the income taxed."

26 posted on 09/02/2005 11:48:33 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: andyk
Here is the 16th amendment, word for word.

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Justice White interpreted it, unfortunatly, taking it literally, that amendment, taken literally, would be at odds with White.

59 posted on 09/02/2005 2:10:51 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson