A little while ago, the mod there chided someone for wanting to use an anti-Bush avatar. I pretty well hold my tongue. Yesterday, some guy wanted to argue about sources with me. Insight mag is bad according to him. AP, NY Times good credible. NUTS!
yes i was pleasantly surprised about them making the person remove the antiBush avatar, and i can respect that they allow diversity of viewpoint etc. They made reference to 3,000 people reading the Board, so maybe with so many few posters/members they have a tighter rein over their posters and a shorter fuse. The mods here would have to be banning people CONSTANTLY if they used the same standards!