Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
Not at all. From The Law of Land Warfare, Chapter 6, Occupation...

And when were those adopted? Just curious.

159 posted on 06/23/2005 11:43:21 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Not at all. From The Law of Land Warfare, Chapter 6, Occupation...

And when were those adopted? Just curious.

They're from the Law of Land Warfare, whose principles were generally first established under the provisions of the Declaration of Paris of 1856. Though subsequent Geneva and Hague Conventions have modified those principles, the 1856 treaties were those that generally set naval conventions, and were the first to eliminate Letters of Marque and Privateering as acceptable methods for the conduct of naval warfare.

Amusingly, the United States had utilized the letter of marque as a weapon during the Revolution and the War of 1812 and accordingly refused to ratify the Declaration of Paris of 1856 which had outlawed privateering. Since the Confederacy was also not a signatory, that left the South free to raid United States flagged vessels, which caused a sudden change of attitudeabout the desirability of Washington agreeing to those accords. Details at the e-history listing for privateers *here*.

Wikipedia additionally offers the following:

Paris, Declaration of, 1856,

agreement concerning the rules of maritime warfare, issued at the Congress of Paris. It was the first major attempt to codify the international law of the sea. Conflicting methods used in dealing with property at sea had demonstrated the need for uniformity, while the respect paid to neutral rights in the Crimean War indicated that common principles of action would be accepted by the great powers. Four principles were enunciated by the declaration: privateering would no longer be considered legal; a neutral flag would protect the goods of an enemy, except for contraband of war; neutral goods, with the exception of contraband of war, would not be liable to capture when under the enemy's flag; a blockade would be binding only if it prevented access to the coast of the enemy. At first the United States refused to accept the declaration, claiming that privateers were necessary if a nation did not have a strong navy. However, the United States accepted the declaration during the Civil War and the Spanish-American War.

At the beginning of World War I prize courts recognized the declaration, but submarine warfare and extensive lists of contraband negated its principles. Part of its aims were restated in 1909 in the Declaration of London, but technological advances made many of its provisions inapplicable in 20th-century warfare.


162 posted on 06/23/2005 12:16:50 PM PDT by archy (The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
according to the US Army field Manual, about 4 CENTURIES ago.

you KNOW that.

free dixie,sw

167 posted on 06/23/2005 2:34:05 PM PDT by stand watie (being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson