[CurlyBill]

Nice freakin' try. I read your profile, and you spent half of it rambling on and on and on about slavery and the South. It's all about your disagreement with this article and my beliefs. This is not about "hubris" or my approach. Anyone reading your profile will know this.

[IrishCatholic]

Sigh, strike three. You forgot about anti-Catholics and anti-police. You also forgot about the stuff about whether you were worth your salt or not. It is now apparent you are not.
It was about hubris. It still is.
Oh, and that rambling stuff was from what... Oh yea. The heads of the Confederacy saying secession was all about slavery.
I guess that lends to the fact that nothing, facts, reason, or the ghost of Jefferson Davis himself would change your belief that you alone hold the light and the truth. Goes back to hubris.

[groanup]

Nice freakin' try. I read your profile, and you spent half of it rambling on and on and on about slavery and the South.

I read his profile too and he is obsessed with the South and slavery. I would ask him only one question: Who in the North went to war to END slavery? I'll answer for me: NO ONE! So don't give me the "South went to war for slavery crap". It was legal and guaranteed by the Constitution. If the South had only one agenda, slavery, it had many other avenues to pursue. The South went to war to end tyrannical central government which was a violation of the contract between the people and the governed. We should be so brave today.