Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
Posted on 06/19/2005 4:08:29 PM PDT by phoenix_004
"I love dogs, but I do hope they pay as much attention to the charge of raping two little girls as the unfortunate demise of Princess."
Come on! They use the dog story to get the reader's attention. The charge is secondary to raping children. If this nation imprisoned these perverts for life, additional chages wouldn't be necessary.
Rather strange way to introduce yourself to a forum to defend the raping of two girls and the killing of a dog by rape by the same person.
Trollin' Trollin' Trollin'...
"You were new once."
Good point. Those who were new once should welcome newbies instead of abusing them. It's like the guy who used to work at McDonald's, put up with abuse, then became an abuser of employees.
Welcome, if we agree or disagree, Stephanie.
Death penalty.
That's right Mabelkitty. Children, the elderly, disabled, and animals cannot defend themselves. If there should be any "hate" crime charges, it should be against those who harm the innocent!
Hi Americanintokyo: I read Stephanieflutter's posts and disagree with them. But I don't think she meant any harm. She said he hasn't been convicted and that we shouldn't throw him away like trash. She seems a little liberal, so lets educate her instead of beating her up. If he is convicted, he should be thrown away like trash (hopefully she agrees) because those who prey upon the innocent (children or animals) cannot be rehabilitated.
Not everyone who disagrees is a troll. FR would be a boring place if everyone agreed on things, and there would be no thought provocation if everyone said the same thing. Salute to those who endure doggy piling for disagreeing here. They open minds. But in Stephanie's case, I can't say I would ever be in favor of trying to "help" an animal abuser and/or rapist of children. They are beyond the pale, outside of my social comfort zone. My people, when in their tribal state, would have slit his throat and buried him in the bogs. Today, liberals find these bog people and opine that they were sacrifices. Right.
I must give Steph credit for pointing out he has not been convicted. I would, though, reiterate another poster's question. What should be done to him if he is found guilty, Stephanie?
"I can imagine, His "Treatment"...His nickname "BARK"..."Trixie"...or much worst. He'll deserve every second/moment of it."
OH! I remember now. Druggies often own pitt bulls. I wonder what they think of pitt bull rapists?
"Why the outrage over this sexual perversion? Would those here in this thread be less offended if somehow it could be proven that the sex with the animal was consensual?"
Like young children, even if the sensation feels good they don't have the mental capacity to consent to sex.
"I understand, and agree; Thank you for waiting. She will be back, provided she doesn't get banned."
She didn't say anything worthy of being banned for. She confused one of the 13 yo victims with the perp and thought he was 13 rather than 17. Good human relations would dictate that we ask for clarity, and explain to her why pedophiles and animal abusers cannot be reformed, rather than attacking her for being naive and putting demonic motives on her. I can think of no better way to run off a potential ally than to attack them for what they don't know.
In fact, people grow and learn as they get older. Those who tried to teach me by telling me what to think rather than showing me HOW to think earned my resentment. It is possible that the attacks on this woman have run her permanently into the other camp.
Unfortunately, raping and molesting children is common. The public is desensitized and only a few cases are reported on by the media. The rape of the dog is sensational, and (hopefully) unusual. The media does NOT consider the dog more important, they just had a sensational headline that would grab viewers'/readers' attention. That bein' said, I support life sentences for all animal abusers, child molesters, those who harm disabled people and the elderly. The innocent and the helpless should be specially protected in this society.
Anyway, thanks. I'm sure I did her no favors by irritating most of the people here with my initial post (now deleted).
WTF??!!"
My thought exactly. Me thinks that there is more to this story than the MSM is letting on.
There are always a few of us who defend those from the "lynch mob." I've been a target myself, which is why I am predisposed to defend those in the minority opinion. I think Steph's just a curious liberal. So? If she wants to debate, lets debate respectfully and present her with rational viewpoints to the contrary. No one is swayed by insults.
I agree, Peter Singer is a freak, and I can't fathom how he balances his freakdom and his position as Ethics Chairman at Princeton. ETHICS!?? With quotes like that? Worse still, Singer is an animal rights activist, also called an animal rights philosopher.
THIS is the article I quoted from.
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
SC ping?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.