I don't wish a tit for tat either. My point is that this writing is simply useless for me because it claims to be from the Lord Himself. However, it is not scripture.
Therefore, it must have errors.
Without those errors identified it is either suspect or it forces me to adjust my understanding of the uniqueness of scripture.
Your, to me, irrational fallacy is to assume that because it is not Scripture, that it must have errors.
You seem to think that God has a muzzle somehow which insures that when God wants to talk further to Believers, that HE MUST do so in a flawed way.
That's silly.
God is not about to be limited at all.
He's certainly not about to be limited in communicating with those in dialogue for whom Christ died that we might have restored dialogue with The Father.
Your distincitions may comfort your biases but I don't find them to have any reality at all with regard to the messages posted.
If you are determined to be prissy about it, then compare every phrase, sentence or whatever to Scripture and throw out anything that doesn't match up with Scripture.
But to try and throw it all out because it is POTENTIALLY flawed is to blackwash any and all communications God may wish to extend to you outside of your reading of the Canon.
If God wants to tell you that there's a better deal on a car at a different dealer--you are in trouble. You will refuse to listen.
If God wants to tell you there's a better potential spouse to marry than the one you are considering--you are in trouble, you will refuse to listen.
If God wants to tell you to take a different route to work today because satan has engineered an effort to kill you in an accident on your regular route--you are in trouble because you will refuse to listen.
Thankfully, some of us have learned to relate to God's communcations with us directly differently.
This sort of listening to God's Voice as Christ commented on--will be increasingly crucial in these end times.