Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: mountaineer
It's entirely possible her husband lied, but it's also possible he was telling the truth when he recounted what she said.

Without a living will, we can't know.

If we can't know, we shouldn't be able to kill.

558 posted on 03/29/2005 12:25:24 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Ghoul Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]


To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

I find it self-evident that if she wanted to die she would not have survived her 9th, 10th, and 11th days of forced dehydration and starvation.


564 posted on 03/29/2005 12:31:24 PM PST by thoughtomator (Order "Judges Gone Wild!" Only $19.95 have your credit card handy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies ]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

When someone testifies in court, the "finder of fact" - whether the judge or a jury - determines the credibility of that witness. If MS testified that Terri said she wouldn't want a feeding tube, there's no evidence to contradict the statement, and the finder of fact found his testimony credible, then it is accepted as fact and may be factored into the verdict or ruling. If we can reject court decrees just because we don't happen to like the outcome, regardless of the evidence, there is anarchy. I reject anarchy, and I'm pretty sure our founding fathers would, too.


566 posted on 03/29/2005 12:32:39 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson