Thanks for posting the excerpt.
"In September of 1990, she was brought home, but following only three weeks, she was returned to the College Park facility because the "family was overwhelmed by Terry's care needs."
Considering that her "home" was with her husband, clearly that is where she was taken, NOT to her parent's home, which would have been identified as such.
Also clearly the "family was overwhelmed" means that MICHAEL didn't want her at home.
Also note, that while MS played the devoted husband, to a T, UNTIL he got the $$$$$ award, as soon as he did, he stopped Terri's rehabilitation, and didn't even want her treated for infection.
Also clearly the "family was overwhelmed" means that MICHAEL didn't want her at home.
Michael Schiavo was living with the Schindler's at the time Ms. Schiavo was brought home in 1990. Michael Schiavo, not the Schindlers, was also responsible for pursuing the extraordinary therapeutic efforts in California and Florida after Ms. Schiavo's brief stay at home.
Also note, that while MS played the devoted husband, to a T, UNTIL he got the $$$$$ award, as soon as he did, he stopped Terri's rehabilitation, and didn't even want her treated for infection.
Sheer, unmitigated nonsense. Please take the time to actually learn the facts. I know it has been said that facts just don't matter here. To the extent that this is in reference to a conclusion that Ms. Schiavo should not have been refused continued feeding, I can understand the sentiment. But facts do matter where the alternative is deliberate falsification in pursuit of a lynching.
I read in transcripts of testimony that Michael and the Schindlers all lived together when Terri was transferred to home care...for 3 weeks, before the Schindlers realized they wouldn't be able to care for her.