2. Can you cite sources that are substantiated?
3. The Schindlers would be considered unbiased?
4. There were two Guardians ad Litem.
5. Again, do you have substantiated proof?
6. I do have a problem with that. The reasoning was that she would choke to death. Now if the feeding tube was removed and she had been fed orally and then choked to death, where would that put us?
"The reasoning was that she would choke to death. Now if the feeding tube was removed and she had been fed orally and then choked to death, where would that put us?"
===
AND WHAT IF SHE DIDN'T (choke to death)?
What if she had been able to swallow and live, proving that she didn't need "artificial" feeding and she is NOT in PVS?
Of course this would have demolished the entire falso foundation of the house of cards MS, Felos and Greer built. This could not be allowed to happen, that's why Greer wouldn't allow Terri to be fed by mouth.
Can you come up with any other explanation for Greer's decision to deny allowing her to be fed by mouth? Is it legal to deny food and nutrition, even by natural means to a person?
The Schindlers don't have to be unbiased, nor did the Schiavos, they simply should not be allowed to be a guardian if their interests may conflict with the person they have been appointed to guard.