Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: shezza
Thanks for the bill. I just don't see, however, how Congress gave any leeway to the District Court. All the "mays" go to the plaintiff and the direction to the courts contain the absolute "shall," including the requirement for a de novo determination. What am I missing that you're seeing in this section?

Key sentence here:

In such a suit, the District Court shall determine de novo any claim of a violation of any right of Theresa Marie Schiavo within the scope of this Act, notwithstanding any prior State court determination and regardless of whether such a claim has previously been raised, considered, or decided in State court proceedings.

The problem is that Gibbs brought no such suit.

3,923 posted on 04/01/2005 12:57:01 PM PST by Poohbah (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3920 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
The problem is that Gibbs brought no such suit.

D'oh!

3,927 posted on 04/01/2005 1:01:32 PM PST by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3923 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
The problem is that Gibbs brought no such suit.

Correct.

3,933 posted on 04/01/2005 1:07:41 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3923 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson