I listened to Dennis Prager for a bit yesterday and that is exacty what he said; that he was against removing the feeding tube but is four square against calling the removal murder.
Are you saying he's not saying what he's saying?
If so, you are demonstrating the inability to confront fact that we are decrying.
Note: I am not arguing your point at this time about the merits of calling the removal murder, but your denial of fact about Prager's position.
I responded to a question about the article, which does not contain that statement. I made no mention of a show I did not listen to.