no and you know that is not what i mean. i have said the presumption should always be for life. obviously if one makes one's wishes clear, there would be no need of a presumption.
I believe you can be for life....AND for supporting the current laws.
Example: I am against abortion. But, because that is the law of the land, I must support that law. That doesn't mean I agree with the law. But were I to advocate anarchy (perhaps the violent overthrow of abortion clinics), I would be wrong.
I can HATE the law...but not castigate people who are for supporting current laws.
One can be FOR life.....and also for the law, imo. The 2 are not mutually exclusive.