Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

your commentary, for which you are responsible, indicates that you believe the Catholic church is not opposed to this. i have provided you proof that they are. i am not interested in where you found your misinformation, just correcting the record with respect to the Catholic Church's position.


1,350 posted on 03/25/2005 2:46:05 PM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1346 | View Replies ]


To: xsmommy

This comes from the Guardian Ad Litem Wolfson's report to Governor Jeb Bush:

(The actual full report is located up thread).

The current, generally accepted applications to terminal illness or persistent vegetative state define artificial feeding as artificial life support that may be withheld or withdrawn. In 1989, the Florida Legislature permitted the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration under very specific circumstances. In 1999, following extensive bipartisan efforts, life-prolonging procedures were redefined as "any medical procedure, treatment, or intervention, including artificially provided sustenance and hydration, which sustains, restores, or supplants a spontaneous vital function." It is noteworthy that the general principle of artificial nutrition as artificial life support that may be removed in terminal and even vegetative state conditions is reflected in nearly all state's laws and within the guidelines of end of life care enunciated by the American Conference of Catholic Bishops and other religious denominations.




1,360 posted on 03/25/2005 2:52:15 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson