Well evolution certainly can't produce such an experiment. This subject matter doesn't lend itself to such textbook experiments.
I don't have to produce anything. The evolutionists have yet to demonstrate any evidence that man evolved from single celled creatures by chance. Its just a theory. Another theory, and I believe to be more plausable, is that the complexity of man arose based on design by an intelligent creator. Both are just mere theories by mere men.
However, competing theories aren't even allowed in many classrooms because of the leftist NEA and the atheists. The evolutionists demand that their theories be presented as the other theory in the classroom. Its a load of crap.
"Well evolution certainly can't produce such an experiment. This subject matter doesn't lend itself to such textbook experiments."
Actually, in experiments, you are not really trying to prove anything true, that is impossible. You are trying to prove it false. The problem of proving something true, is that you can run an experiment 1000 times, 10,000 times and have it validate your hypothesis. But if you run another experiment, and it proves your hypothesis false, out it goes (the hypothesis, not the experiment), or at least you have to go back and modify your hypothesis.
So, yes, YOU DO need to prove it false.
Please, for everyone's sake, learn what theory means.