[Prov3456]

One thing you forgot to mention in your explanation of basic science: No one now living (or ever living, for that matter) was alive to "OBSERVE" the beginning, ie. the first step in your gathering of evidence for scientific hypothesis.

Hence, both Darwinism and creationism are theories.

I simply prefer to believe the later, based on what I've learned from other scientists (including Gallileo, Keppler, and others) and Whom I know who was there.

[Tamberlane]

One thing you forgot to mention in your explanation of basic science: No one now living (or ever living, for that matter) was alive to "OBSERVE" the beginning, ie. the first step in your gathering of evidence for scientific hypothesis.

What would it take for you people to realize that the theory of evolution is not about 'the beginning' (of life on earth)?

[b_sharp]

"One thing you forgot to mention in your explanation of basic science: No one now living (or ever living, for that matter) was alive to "OBSERVE" the beginning, ie. the first step in your gathering of evidence for scientific hypothesis. "

No one now living (or ever living for that matter) observed God create the universe or Earth.

"Hence, both Darwinism and creationism are theories. "

Evolution is a theory. Creation does not meet any of the criteria for a theory, therefore is not a theory.