[DelphiUser]

>> "Um, What part of "If I had been that way for six months" didn't you understand? "

>> You argued that you would have had your own life ended, based on false information. You destroyed your own argument. Nice try.

Those who fail to read have no advantage over those who cannot.

We are talking about feelings here which is obviously a subject you are little acquainted with. How I felt while incapacitated is relevant. Have you ever been in a PVS (I am refraining from jokes here) or otherwise incapacitated? if not you may wish to rethink criticizing those who have, and the decisions they make.

As for my decision, if you had read the whole post you would have seen that I decided to "Make the best of it", but actually reading a post before replying would seem to be too much to ask.

as for false information:
Are you arguing that terry has a better than 50% chance of recovery? Quote your source.
Are you saying she is there based on a false diagnosis? Quote your source.
Are you saying she wants to linger at death's door? Quote your source.

If you can't back up why, don't post to this guy. (Jessie would be so proud)

[SerpentDove]

"Are you arguing that terry has a better than 50% chance of recovery? Quote your source."

I suppose to your way of thinking, because she is incapacitated, she should be dead. I disagree.

"Are you saying she is there based on a false diagnosis? Quote your source."

Is she *where* because of a false diagnosis? The only false diagnosis I keep hearing is that she is in a persistent vegetative state or that she is brain dead.

"Are you saying she wants to linger at death's door? Quote your source."

She wouldn't be at death's door if not for a judge giving her the death penalty, for no crime whatsoever.

Are you saying she wants to be starved to death? Quote YOUR source. And skip the rubbish about what her adulterous husband said.