[Cultural Jihad]

And, what does an anti-immigration stance have to do with my post on the reality of the coming Mexican revolution?

Because revolutions are often violent, and people tend to want to flee violence just as they like to flee hunger and want. If the goal is to smartly reform immigration, then go with President Bush. If the goal is to do something, anything, then go with Hillary.

[txdoda]

Did you miss post 2610 ??

[P_A_I]

Eventually, regardless of what we do, the situation in Mexico will explode. We should get prepared, and then let it happen.

And when the Communists rise to power in DF, the anti-immigrants here will be most pleased, eh?

Commies in DF? Can you translate?

And, what does an anti-immigration stance have to do with my post on the reality of the coming Mexican revolution?

Because revolutions are often violent, and people tend to want to flee violence just as they like to flee hunger and want. If the goal is to smartly reform immigration, then go with President Bush.

The present 'goal' is to prevent a revolution in Mexico by allowing a relatively open border. -- And no one here wants an open border, it is claimed.

Commies in DF? --- Can you translate?

[FITZ]

Because revolutions are often violent, and people tend to want to flee violence just as they like to flee hunger and want.

Toppling the corrupt government of Iraq also required a little violence---- but now look --- Bush worked his magic and Iraq is a free democrat country with no more problems. If a little bloodshed and violence is worth it on the other side of the world --- why do you fear Mexicans overthrowing their corrupt elite?

Plus you're only assuming these peaceful hard working illegals pouring over the borders are really just very violent thugs who couldn't work for peaceful reforms in their own country. They are Mexico's would be middle class --- all that really needs to happen is the corrupt elite allow for a middle class and all the important changes to allow for one.