[Do not dub me shapka broham]

When I find myself in a surreal discussion, I ask myself, "How would Ionesco approach this situation?"

Putatively "anti-arson" FReeper:

I am adamantly opposed to arson. I oppose it with every fiber of my being.

Actual "anti-arson" FReeper:

I'm glad to hear it! Let's call the fire marshal, then.

FReeper #1:

No, no, no! We mustn't. It's simply impossible!

FReeper #2:

Hunh? I thought that you were opposed to arson?

Freeper #1:

Yes, yes. I am strenuously opposed to arson. Aren't we all? But we must not impose our moral perspective on someone who does not adhere to our strict moral compunctions, as far as burning down things is concerned. Instead, I propose an alternative tack. We give the arsonist a case of nitroglycerin, a functional blowtorch, and an oxygen tank.

FReeper #2:

Hunh?

(Utterly baffled stare.)

[fatima]

Thanks R L.I did not read this whole thread and did not get your post:).I know I am just dumb.

[bayourod]

I can see why you're befuddled. Ionesco said try substituting gravity for arsen.