No, you are wrong. Absolutely wrong.
My point is not that the calculations are done incorrectly, but they are completely irrelevant. The calculate the probability of something that evolutionists don't say happens.
No biologist would look at a bridge hand and say it is impossible because the odds against it being dealt are prohibitively high. The odds might be calculated without error, but the application is in error.
The probabilites are cited by the creationist but they come from the evolutionist. Get it straight before you go making any more ridiculous analogies!
"No, you are wrong. Absolutely wrong."
„Ï Cytochrome-C is one of the most important proteins that make oxygen respiration possible. It is vital for survival. It is impossible for this protein, which has an extremely complex design, to form by chance. One of the foremost defenders of evolution in Turkey, Professor Ali Demirsoy states in his book Inheritance and Evolution that the probability of the coincidental formation of Cytochrome-C is "as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes."8