Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Polybius; Non-Sequitur
As I noted, during the war itself, nobody referred to it as a "Civil War".

"[T]he moment this House undertakes to legislate upon this subject [of slavery], it dissolves the Union. Should it be my fortune to have a seat upon this floor, I will abandon it the instant the first decisive step is taken looking towards legislation of this subject. I will go home to preach, and if I can, practice, disunion, and civil war, if needs be. A revolution must ensue, and this republic sink in blood."
- South Carolina Congressman James Hammond, on the Floor of the House of Representatives.

The southerners knew what they were doing. It was rebellion. It was insurrection. It was civil war. And it was planned.

315 posted on 01/07/2005 9:39:38 AM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio
I will go home to preach, and if I can, practice, disunion, and civil war, if needs be. A revolution must ensue, and this republic sink in blood."

In a rebellion or a war of independence, the "civil war" aspect would be the part of the war in where the citizens of the same State would be partisans and fighting each other.

Torry vs Patriot armed conflict would be an example of "civil war" in the American Revolutionary War.

Union loyalist vs Confederate loyalist in Southern States armed conflict or Copperhead vs Union loyalist armed conflict in Northern States would be an example of "civil war" in the 1861-1865 war.

Would the Battle of Saratoga against British forces be considered a battle in a "Civil War"?

319 posted on 01/07/2005 10:00:36 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson