[Who is John Galt?]

No, I'm answering the Thomas question as posted. The Constitution recognizes a mechanism for 'the people' to speak, -- through trials by jury. - Fully informed impartial juries that can nullify unconstitutional applications of law.

Wrong. Mr. Justice Thomas referred to “undifferentiated people of the Nation.” Unless you are proposing some kind of ‘jury’ composed of approximately 300 million people, your post is both nonsensical and completely irrelevant.

Suit yourself.. If you want to deny you support the 'states rights' position, it's fine with me.

And if you want to assume, without any basis in fact, that my States rights position indicates that I "want States to have sovereign power over individuals, - over their rights to life liberty or property,” it’s fine by me. It simply indicates that you are having some trouble grasping reality...

;>)

[antisocial]

Well said my friend, I'm enjoying your posts, you are so clearly defeating your opponents, that they are the only ones that don't realize it.

[jonestown]

Who is John Galt? wrote:

--- your post is both nonsensical and completely irrelevant.
--- you are having some trouble grasping reality...

---

Your words above are definitve of your last post.

Feel proud.