[Thatcherite]

What is the difference in this context between microevolution and macroevolution? Which modern animals do you think Noah didn't have on the ark? (eg how many insects and fish do you think he was carrying, and how many marsupials?)

Do you reject the abundant physical evidence that the earth is c 4 billion years old and the universe c 14 billion years old as well as rejecting evolution? If so you are rejecting pretty much the whole of science. I ask because anti-evolutionists seem to encompass such a wide spectrum of contradictory beliefs.

[derheimwill]

What is the difference in this context between microevolution and macroevolution?

If I understand your question, Noah had a gorilla on the ark but not an eastern-lowland gorilla, a mountain gorilla and a western gorilla.

Do you reject the abundant physical evidence that the earth is c 4 billion years old..."

No, I interpret it differently.
Light was created before the stars. That gets it down to a few hundren million. It also eliminates the need for string theory.
The deluge explains the rock strata. If you do an experiment with several thousands of gallons of water, some silt and sand and a few dead critters, you get the same thing.
Here's a question:How do fish leave fossils? "Modern" ones don't.