Be careful here. Science at any moment is embodied in the practicing scientists of the time, just as religion is embodied in its preachers.
You are correct in saying "science" is morally neutral, but incorrect if you are implying that all scientific organizations are innocent.
The early proponents of evolution did get heavily into "Social Darwinism".
Not the scientists. Just the kooks. If you want to talk biological science and why it substantiates evolution, let me know.
Let's try to stick to the subject.