[conservative_crusader]

"Oh, yeah, gotta watch out for those militaristic babies!"

I'll have you know, that given in history, had there not been a certain baby, "Ishmael" was his name, the entire Arabic world would not exist. Or are you going to argue with something that is canonically accepted?

"So, was your god too busy or too lazy to do it himself?"

You really think you're clever don't you? Okay I'll play your game, If you're so important, why doesn't God reveal himself to you right now. Answer: Because he wants you to be faithful. But since you won't accept that, I'll be satisfied to rip your fallacious arguments to shreds.

In answer to your question, It is not your place to argue with the morality of a supreme being, you have yet to disprove that one does not exists, whereas I have proved one exists in post #126. Argue that, and then I might lend some credence to your arguments.

[balrog666]

In answer to your question, It is not your place to argue with the morality of a supreme being,

Is it really your place to speak for any such being or beings? I didn't think so.

you have yet to disprove that one does not exists,

Humm, prove a negative through logic, huh? Wow, you are even more ignorant than I realized.

... whereas I have proved one exists in post #126.

Really? Which one?

Argue that, and then I might lend some credence to your arguments.

[Sigh] You have "proved" nothing except in your own mind. Your inability to understand that obvious point tells us everything to know about you and your "arguments".