Replies

"There is no argument against biological evolution, except a
trumped up one."

Argumentum Ad Ignorantium. Saying there is no argument, or that something cannot be proved, is a fallacy.

"Science discards wrong headed ideas, unlike creationuts. "

I don't know. For thousands of years people who were geniuses believed that the world was held up by titans. In the Bible, Jesus told those who came to him that the world was hung on nothing. And while this could have been a guess on his part (I do not believe so,) most Christians would believe that at least the world was hung on nothing, whereas those who would support more "scientific" ventures (like the Greeks,) "knew" perfectly well that Atlas held up the world.

"The TOE contains nothing about original creation and nothing about balls rolling up or down hill."

Once again this is the fallacy Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc. Just because the Theory of evolution does not contain creationism, does not mean that the creationism is not true.

"Analogies like yours are useless against millions of facts that all fit together into a coherent theory."

Millions of facts eh? In all honesty it does not matter whether or not evolution is so. Like I said earlier, some god could have even used evolution as a tool.

Come on shubi, please argue my point and not say that I'm full of feces.

Just because the Theory of evolution does not contain creationism, does not mean that the creationism is not true.

So who is arguing differently? How many times must the incredibly obvious be pointed out to you?

As for your analogy with balls rolling uphill, where exactly to you think this applies to evolution?