WHAT?!
Big bang as catalyst for our universal existence...Yes.
ID...maybe. (who could ever prove it in our material existence?)
Creationism as anything more that a desperate ill-thought
trick for self-substantiation...No way.
Creationism is not scientific at all. It can only be believed
through faith. Evolution is verified with open eyes to the
reality all around us. You may not think you condescended
from monkeys but I’m not ashamed to say that apes are in
the branches of my family tree.
Apes are preferable to mother in laws.
"I’m not ashamed to say that apes are in
the branches of my family tree."
LOL, so you are the missing link and proud of it. Do you sit in a chair and type with the keyboard on the floor?
Repost #195:In a nutshell, Creation is more in line with the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics than evolution. Something does not come from nothing and the organized tends toward disorganization.
The expanding universe shows it had a beginning and requires an outside source. "Chance" is unlikely, our planets and the life on it requires very specific conditions. There was a plan. There is adaptaion but not evolution. Genetic code does not allow reproduction outside of a species. Homology can show similarities but not relation.