Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

#####Yes. But does that mean that, over time, as the process of natural selection plays its role, we should end up with a species that is much stronger (or faster, or something) than its distant ancestors?#####


Absolutely! Natural selection would reasonably be expected to strengthen some existing species, while leading to the extinction of others.


961 posted on 12/01/2004 5:36:25 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]


To: puroresu
Absolutely! Natural selection would reasonably be expected to strengthen some existing species, while leading to the extinction of others.

Fine. Now ponder this. Suppose a group of animals, who naturally undergo this process, became separated from the main herd (or pack, or whatever). Permanently separated, perhaps by a big earthquake, or something like that. Now you would have two groups, and they no longer mingle. Each undergoes this "strengthening process" as a result of natural selection.

Now, time passes. A thousand generations. Ten thousand generations. Suppose the two groups were to be compared, perhaps by a traveling naturalists. What would he find?

969 posted on 12/01/2004 5:52:56 PM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson