#####To be a theory, it has to make predictions and be falsifiable. What theories does ID make that evolution does not? How would one falsify "that's just the way God did it?"#####
I agree, and evolutionists can always just say, "things were different back then". Neither ID nor evolution is actually observable or falsifiable. There is literally nothing that would cause evolutionists to abandon the theory. Prove that nothing is evolving now and they'll just say things were different back then. Find no gradual transitions in the fossils and they'll shout "punctuated equilibria".
Evolution's an interesting theory. It's within the realm of possibility, I suppose, that it's even correct. But it isn't Holy Writ and shouldn't be treated as anything more than a lot of conjecture based on a materialistic worldview that carries a ton of ideological baggage and is enshrined more because of its political appeal than its evidence.
Actually, they can't. Evolution makes certain predictions (that fossils will be found in a specific sequence, for example). Creationists are the ones renowned for the "things were different back then." For example, creationists are always going on about the speed of light being faster in the past, or radioactive decay having been accelerated shortly after God created the Earth.