Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: puroresu
I question the degree of certainty with which it's put forward and the tendency to disqualify competing theories.

The degree of certainty to which it is put forward is based on the fact that it has acheived the level of theory.

Could you state a "competing" theory?
940 posted on 12/01/2004 4:46:08 PM PST by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 937 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

#####The degree of certainty to which it is put forward is based on the fact that it has acheived the level of theory.#####

Or has it become ideologically entrenched? A psychology professor who calls homosexuality abnormal likely won't get tenure. Ditto for a biology professor who questions evolution. Scientists are no less subject to the zeitgeist than anyone else.



#####Could you state a "competing" theory?#####

Intelligent design, for one. But since science is defined in such a way as to exclude it, that one has no chance to pass through the filter. Feel free to offer evolution as a theory, but don't expect people to necessarily swallow it.


945 posted on 12/01/2004 5:09:50 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson