Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: cainin04
you can suggest that Darwin did not make the case for no need for a God if you wish (the origins of life and the non-directional or random change in living organisms), but that assessment is different than mine.

My assessment is based on the fact that Darwin specifically referenced a Creator in his work. What's your basis?

The theory makes the claim that humans evolved from apes! Nowhere in the fossil record is this suggested to be correct. It also goes against the God from the Bible--which I believe. If life did evolve in this way, there is no purpose for life and humans are nothing more than supped-up animals--and I disagree with that notion.

False dichotomy fallacy. Believe it or not, not everyone who disagrees with your theological viewpoint is an atheist.
632 posted on 11/29/2004 6:16:54 PM PST by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

Ok, if you say that Darwin "specifically referenced a Creator" that is great.

Also, I am not calling anyone an atheist. If we simply disagree with the manner inwhich God Created the world and its life-forms, then we agree on the biggest point--THERE IS A CREATOR OF LIFE.

The original point of the discussion was that other theories should not be taught in school. I am totally open to marco-evolution being taught as a theory, but the other major idea that explains how "species" came to exist should be taught as well--ID.

Take the Fox News slogan "We report you decide." That is how it should be in the schools. You have to admit that many people (especially in college) have tilted toward atheism because they were taught that evolution eliminates the need for God (atleast that is how the professors I have had--except for one--presented it). On a many of college campus you will be laughed at if you believe in God--and the person laughing will cite his biology professor! This whole issue is nothing more than another example of liberalism run wild in our schools.

All I ask is that both sides of the story be presented and let people make their own judgements from there. I would think that the open-minded members of the FR would agree with that premise. I can't believe many of you do not.


636 posted on 11/29/2004 6:31:11 PM PST by cainin04 (Concerned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson