Who ruled this was to be a "debate"?
Ah, breathe it in, folks. That's the scent of pure, unadulterated Christian PRIDE. The sort of pride that leads people to honestly believe that other peopel don't believe as they do because those other people are immoral.
For someone who claims to be in a "debate," you certainly have an odd style and a total knack for repeatedly jumping to unfounded conclusions.
> Who ruled this was to be a "debate"?
You're right. It's not. It's little more than an evolved version of monkeys hurling their feces at each other.
> repeatedly jumping to unfounded conclusions
Hmm. You mean like:
"You would rather believe anything than consider there is a Creator you must and will answer to someday."
THAT is what I call an unfounded conclusion, jumped to out of ignorance and pride.