There is nothing in this post that I did not already know or agree with. Obviously, you either don't know how to read or just fail to do so.
The question is increasing complexity.
However, with specific regard to my son, it is not exactly as you say. Cytochrome-C oxidase is actually coded from both nuclear and non-nuclear (mitochondrial) DNA. It is unknown whether his disorder is from the mitochondrial DNA or the nuclear DNA. If it is from the mitochondrial DNA it is actually ONLY based on the maternal side.
Do you really enjoy acting like you're the only person in the world who knows anything? Do you really think that creationists don't understand basic mendellian genetics or natural selection? You probably forgot that mendellian genetics was discovered by a creationist :)
Anyway, if you bothered to read and understand what others are saying, you might have better arguments. Just adding words to previous arguments doesn't in itself make a better argument.
There is nothing in this post that I did not already know or agree with. Obviously, you either don't know how to read or just fail to do so.
ss: yam ony twee yeaws od boohooohooo He taid eye dunt no how to reed.
The question is increasing complexity.
ss: Increasing complexity is a made up piece of nonsense by your creationut masters. No scientist thinks evolution necessarily get more complex as time goes on. If you want "proof" of this (the always want proof but I think they mean poof) study parasites. Parasitic worms, for instance, are missing organs like digestive tracts that other worms have. Oh yeah, God poofed parasites into existence. Why would God make parasites? He must not like us much.
However, with specific regard to my son, it is not exactly as you say. Cytochrome-C oxidase is actually coded from both nuclear and non-nuclear (mitochondrial) DNA. It is unknown whether his disorder is from the mitochondrial DNA or the nuclear DNA. If it is from the mitochondrial DNA it is actually ONLY based on the maternal side.
ss: This should be easy to determine. If your wife has the disease it is mitochondrial. If she doesn't it is nuclear.
Do you really enjoy acting like you're the only person in the world who knows anything? Do you really think that creationists don't understand basic mendellian genetics or natural selection?
ss: Yes
You probably forgot that mendellian genetics was discovered by a creationist :)
ss: I am a creationist in that sense. There is a difference between a theistic evolution rationalist and a creationut, like yourself.
Anyway, if you bothered to read and understand what others are saying, you might have better arguments. Just adding words to previous arguments doesn't in itself make a better argument.
ss: Just making up stuff isn't argument, my friend. I understand what you are saying to the point where you start spouting nonsense, which is just about immediately.