Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: LittleSpotBlog
But you can almost eliminate the risk of lung cancer by not smoking.

Really, then why are only 30% of lung cancers smoking related?

Emphysema is also virtually unheard of in non-smokers.

Not so, nearly everyone is born with it, but it doesn't manifest itself in everyone.

I didn't say smoking was not a risk factor for some health problems, I'm not stupid, my point is that tobacco DOES not CAUSE everything they say it does. Does it increase some risks? Yes. But correlation is not the same as causation.

I don't know what rumors on the internet you are talking about, because I am talking about research and medical knowlege. I don't happen to be at my own computer right now and so do not had files and links at my fingertips - but they are out there and have been posted here at FR time and time again.

I do not trust information coming from people that earn their living by receiving grants from Left-wing foundations seeking to destroy the hospitality industry and improve their own bottom line.

168 posted on 11/19/2004 8:42:47 AM PST by Gabz (Thank a Veteran today............and every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz

You misunderstand cause and effect. If you're struck by lightning, does the bolt kill you, or do you die of a heart attack? Both answers are actually correct. Smoking causes cancer. Period. End of story. If you need a recap of the history of that relationship being distinguished, here's a good one I found.

http://www.txtwriter.com/Onscience/Articles/smokingcancer2.html


176 posted on 11/19/2004 8:51:43 AM PST by LittleSpotBlog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson