There you go again, capitan. As the record of this thread plainly shows, I directly quoted the court's ruling, which says in the plainest of language that Lincoln obstructed the court. Try as you may, there are some things you simply cannot fib about and get away with.
As it was, there was no legal process to "illegally arrest."
Hence the word illegal.
None of those federal judges had the appropriate jurisdiction.
The Judiciary Act of 1789, which gave them their jurisdiction, says otherwise.
BTW, have you come up with an authoritative source who makes the same novel charges as you?
Considering that the Murphy decision was virtually forgotten to history until it was revived here on FR earlier this year, I don't believe there is much of anything out there that even discusses it beyond what's been noted here. That being the case, I'm content to rely upon the decision itself as a primary source, which is more authoritative than any running commentary one of your leftist court historians of choice could ever provide.
Who again, is your authoritative source?