To: Sacajaweau; MEG33; RGSpincich; All
I was a little worried yesterday up until it was reported that by the end of the day the Jurors were asking for more exhibits.
They are still working hard, and after all...there is 5 months worth of testimony to go thru.
Nancy said it best last night. In CA, unlike other states, the evidence does not automatically go back into the deliberation room with them, just their notes. It has to be requested.
And wouldn't it be so WRONG if they did NOT request any evidence to be reviewed??
91 posted on
11/09/2004 7:56:23 AM PST by
Jackie-O
To: Jackie-O
Thank you for the added information on what they're doing. I should know better than to rely solely on "pundits" (ack).
97 posted on
11/09/2004 8:09:08 AM PST by
cyncooper
(And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
To: Jackie-O
The exhibits they asked for were real "meat" stuff Jackie. Tidal searches on the computer, wiretaps with Amber etc., boat cover, and a number of other really relevant things. The list is on WS. It's good stuff. I'm believing they will make it. Remember last week I predicted Wednesday, maybe they will surprise me and come back today.
144 posted on
11/09/2004 11:41:55 AM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson