Please note the first use of "Just how stupid are you?" When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Post with civility, and you will receive it from me in kind.
Texas vs White was all about constitutional principles. But we have already been over this ground. If you don't believe that the Constitution represented a binding agreement, then Texas v White would have no meaning to you.
This whole thread has been a dumping ground for you to insult anyone who disagrees with you, or any author whose citation stands against you. In my own case, you accused me of aligning with the Nazis and "claiming them as a moral authority," to which I responded that you were being an ass. I even asked, "Pretty please with sugar on top, knock it off."
Texas vs White was all about constitutional principles. But we have already been over this ground. If you don't believe that the Constitution represented a binding agreement, then Texas v White would have no meaning to you.
Oddly, there are those who believe that Constitutional principles are to be found in the Constitution. Saying "we've been over this ground before" in no way grants additional validity to the mysticism which you used to support your argument last time.