Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; GOPcapitalist
Thank you for the additional information and the link. The point that I was originally responding to was the statement by GOPc that,

"The overwhelming majority of southerners ... fought because Lincoln's army was on their doorsteps shooting at them, and when you get shot the obvious thing to do is shoot back!"

The overwhelming majority of southerners, even excluding free and enslaved blacks, did not fight at all.

To the extent that those in the south who did take up arms, largely took them up in the southern cause, is accepted fact.

I would add to the list the border slave state of Maryland (and possibly Delaware too), which provided a large number of troops to both sides. And, though there are some who would deny it, a substantial number of aboriginal Americans fought "for the Union" (recognizing that inter-tribal rivalries may have been a more significant factor in their alliances).

1,329 posted on 09/17/2004 8:59:22 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1303 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio
The overwhelming majority of southerners, even excluding free and enslaved blacks, did not fight at all.

Post your stats and sources then. We already know that a higher percentage of the southern population fought in the armies than did the northern population.

1,344 posted on 09/17/2004 9:56:44 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist ("Can Lincoln expect to subjugate a people thus resolved? No!" - Sam Houston, 3/1863)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson