That's what I said and that's what I gave you. Illinois petitioned Congress to run a pilot program. That's exactly what you asked for.
Can I post lies about you also?
You clearly asked for a case where a state petitioned the Congress to prove an act and that's what I gave you.
[Gianni, post #820] I asked for an example of any act of a state which followed your interpretation of Article IV. If I understand you correctly, a state needed to: 1. petition the federal legislature for enact laws reagarding proof of an act 2. dawdle while such acts were being debated and passed 3. await the presidents approval of such acts 4. move forward with their planned act
Yep, that's what I gave you. Illinois is wanting approval from Congress before they move forward. I'm sure that proof will consist of arrangements with neighboring states. It's exactly what the southern states should have done when they wanted to secede.
nolu chan posted the article in which Illinois was bitch-slapped for openly violating federal law by engaging in illegal international importation of medicines.
The southern states got the bitch-slapping of all time. lol
What's all this about Indiana, Mo, and KY
They have concerns about business. Their people will get their medications from Illinois. There's going to have to be an arrangement. It's what Article IV is all about...prescribing laws to prove acts.
Count the KIA.
It isn't much to laugh about.