I just wished to document that your search criteria had nothing to do with the U.S. Constitution, or Article 4, Section 1 thereof; nor anything to do with the full faith and credit clause; nor anything to do with proving a state Act.
Just because your search criteria was irrelevant to our discussion does not mean the effort was useless. If the subject of a state petitioning Congress for relief from the restrictions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act does come up, you have a head start on that conversation.
So says you. I say it does. Gianni asked for an example where a state petitioned the legislatue. "state petition congress" was as a direct a search as you can get with "illinois petition congress" not far behind. Simple. 2 minutes.
Just because your search criteria was irrelevant to our discussion does not mean the effort was useless.
Not irrevelant at all. It's exactly what Gianni asked for. Go and look at what he asked, word for word.
If the subject of a state petitioning Congress for relief from the restrictions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act does come up, you have a head start on that conversation.
Illinois could ignore Article IV and Article I like the southern states did but apparently we try to stay true to our word more. Indiana, Missouri and Kentucky would be pretty mad if we acted without their sayso. That's what Article IV is about.